Summary of Knowledge claims and Questions from Skype session Friday, April 28, 2006
KC#1 The Massachusetts Union of Teachers (M.U.T.) tries to be pro-active about educational policy.
- Who sets educational policy?
- What does it mean to be proactive?
- Which states have unions that are proactive?
- What’s the opposite to proactive?
- What does it take for the M.U.T. to get out there to try to shape policy?
- Are these proactive unions being very successful in trying to shape policy (or are they swamped trying to respond to the demands of No Child Left Behind, etc.)
KC#2a The [M.U.T.] executive is aware that advances in genetics have captured a lot of media attention
- What kinds of media? (e.g., television, newspapers, films, documentaries, representations in novels …others?)
- Would knowing how people’s ideas are being formed helped teachers get over their confusion on the merits of these arguments?
- Have other parts of biology also captured attention, e.g. developmental biology? New developments or findings in education?
KC#2b … and reinforced the idea that most human characters are governed by a genetic blueprint.
- Who says how widespread this idea is?
- What is meant by a blueprint?
- What range of ideas is there about what people mean by a genetic blueprint?
- How often is the blueprint image used in talking about education and school achievement (as contrasted with [it’s use in] general science discoveries?
- What other images for the role of genes are there – e.g. “program” Others?
KC#3a This has combined with the push for high-stakes testing (i.e., high stakes for public school funding, not only for students)
- Who is pushing for high-stakes testing?
- How did the normal “tests” in school get rolled back? What is the longer historical perspective on this?
- What are these test based on?
- How are they made?
- Is there a “testing” industry and how can it be characterized or described in a political sense?
- Do the tests work?
- What do we know about this approach to improving educational performance?
KC#3b … and with more than two decades of cut-backs in government funding for social programs.
- Where is that funding going [instead of social programs]?
- How do cutbacks relate to a long-term historical perspective – and specifically to arguments such as do social programs breed dependency, etc.?
- Who is interested in pushing for social programs to be cut?
- What are their ideas about motivation, nature vs. nurture, etc?
KC#4 The result seems to be widespread skepticism about the possibilities for education to boost children's intelligence.
- What is mean by intelligence?
- Widespread skepticism among whom?
- Is there a factual basis for their skepticism? Is there factual support for it?
KC#5a One argument for high stakes testing is that it is needed to motivate harder work among students
KC#5b [Can] hard work make a difference?
KC#5c If hard work can make a difference, what does that say about the argument that IQ is inborn?
KC#6 Teacher's preconceptions about students' potential (or lack of it) can be self-fulfilling.
KC#7 Generalizations about groups (e.g., African-Americans or ESLimmigrants) often get translated into preconceptions about individual students
KC#8 Almost everyone speaks about addressing the needs of diverse learners.
KC#9 Teachers … are confused about the arguments on intelligence being inborn versus changeable
K: There are different arguments on intelligence
A: These may lead to different learning styles
Q: What are the different types of intelligences and how can they be applied?
F: Howard Gardner’s Theory on Multiple Intelligences
K: Intelligence is nurture not nature
A: How class affects intelligence
Q: What is the larger picture of the nature nurture debate in regard to intelligence?
K: According to these misinformed teachers nature causes lack of intelligence
A: Teachers not teaching well, perpetuating the problem
Q: What is the role of genetic causation?
K: Different approaches need to be taken to teach with Inner-City kids
A: What method will best suit teaching in this environment
Q: What methods have been used specifically for teaching those of a lesser class?
Q2: What is the sociological research available behind kids from lower classes?
Q3: What are comparative systems of education in developing countries?
K: Governments cut-back on spending for social programs
A: The public schools in areas of lower taxes suffer
Q: What are the direct economic consequences of these actions?
Q2: How are they being remedied?
K: The IQ Test is a respected measure of intelligence
A: The results of this test determine a child's role in academia
Q: What are the counterarguments to this notion?
Q2: What role does the IQ test currently play in academia?
Q3: What is the history of the IQ test?
(ss)